This will be replaced by the player.

Bank of America to repay TARP

Photobucket

Bank of America Corp said it would repay $45 billion of taxpayer bailout funds, a move that could free the top U.S. lender from pay curbs as it looks to hire a new CEO but also makes it more vulnerable to further economic shocks.

The surprise announcement on Wednesday marks a victory for outgoing Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis, who is expected to retire from his post by the end of the year. Lewis has said that repaying the government was something he wanted to accomplish before stepping down.

The announcement is also a shot in the arm for the U.S. Treasury, which has been under fire for the hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars it has shelled out to corporate America during the financial crisis.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based banking leader is expected to repay its Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds over the next few days.

Bank observers said Bank of America’s repayment may be the first in a wave of TARP repayments by major U.S. banks that have yet to repay the government bailout funds, including Citigroup Inc and Wells Fargo & Co.

“Once the dam is broken, my bet is we’re going to see other institutions announce total or partial repayment plans,” said Tony Plath, banking professor at University of North Carolina- Charlotte.

The U.S. government injected $45 billion into Citigroup, while Wells Fargo received $25 billion.

A U.S. Treasury official called the repayment a step in the right direction, adding that replacing Treasury investments with private capital would provide a boost to confidence.

Bank of America Chief Risk Officer Greg Curl, considered a leading contender to replace Lewis, played an instrumental role in gaining the government’s permission to repay the TARP funds. His success could bolster his chances as a contender for the CEO position, according to financial industry sources.

“It’s a feather in his cap,” said Anton Schutz, president of Mendon Capital in Rochester, New York.

The announcement comes as the bank has bristled under U.S. pay czar Kenneth Feinberg’s curbs on senior management compensation. It has repeatedly expressed its interest in repaying the funds as soon as possible.

In an interview with Reuters, Feinberg called the bank’s plan to repay TARP money “very satisfying” and said it was “exactly the goal” of his oversight.

Read the rest of this page »

Asia shares dip in nervous trade, dollar steady

Photobucket

Asian shares slipped on Friday, but recovered some early losses, while the dollar was steady after U.S. data raised fears that a global economic recovery could lose momentum.

European shares, however, were expected to bounce back from the previous session’s sharp drop, while U.S. equity futures were flat.

The dollar .DXY held firm against a basket of major currencies as some investors shifted back to safer assets despite extremely low yields, while hedge funds were reported to be taking profits ahead of closing their books for the year-end.

Investors were unnerved by a report showing that a record one in seven U.S. mortgages were in foreclosure or at least one payment past due in the third quarter, signaling a recovery in the U.S. housing market will be tepid at best.

“Hedge funds are cashing out their positions to prepare for year-end redemption requests from the clients. And that move is encouraging others to take profits as well,” the head of a trading desk at a big Japanese bank in Tokyo said.

Tech shares suffered some of the heaviest losses after a U.S. brokerage downgrade of the semiconductor industry, which helped send the S&P index .SPX down 1.3 percent overnight. The tech sector has been one of the leaders in a strong global equities rally that has extended into its ninth month. .N

Japan’s Nikkei index .N225 slid 0.5 percent, marking a fourth straight week of losses and its longest negative run in more than a year, as the government announced the world’s second-largest economy was back in deflation.

The yen, like the dollar, benefited from demand for safer assets, adding pressure on shares of Japanese exporters. They included electronics giant Sony Corp (6758.T), which slid 2.4 percent to a near four-month low on doubts the company’s new business strategy could deliver strong profit growth.

The MSCI index of Asia Pacific stocks traded outside Japan .MIAPJ0000PUS and the Thomson Reuters index of regional shares .TRXFLDAXPU both slipped 0.5 percent, though the Asia ex-Japan index remains up about 65 percent in the year to date.

In Taiwan, the world’s biggest contract chipmaker TSMC (2330.TW), which sells the bulk of its chips to North America, fell 2 percent.

“Unless Christmas sales (of technology products) are very good, we don’t think the market can rebound significantly,” said Alex Huang, director of Mega International Securities in Taipei.

RECORD FUND INFLOWS

While some market watchers fear share prices have run up too far ahead of economic fundamentals, other analysts say the retreat from equities may only be temporary as excess global liquidity will continue to encourage fund inflows into Asia.

The region’s economies are showing signs of rebounding from the global financial crisis far faster than the United States, the UK and Europe, where consumer sentiment remains fragile.

In Hong Kong — which has attracted record fund inflows of more than $70 billion since October last year — central bank chief Norman Chan warned that rapid inflows posed a dilemma for policymakers across Asia as they raise the risk of potentially destabilizing asset bubbles.

Read the rest of this page »

What are Stocks?

Photobucket

Plain and simple, stock is a share in the ownership of a company. Stock represents a claim on the company’s assets and earnings. As you acquire more stock, your ownership stake in the company becomes greater. Whether you say shares, equity, or stock, it all means the same thing.

Being an Owner
Holding a company’s stock means that you are one of the many owners (shareholders) of a company and, as such, you have a claim (albeit usually very small) to everything the company owns. Yes, this means that technically you own a tiny sliver of every piece of furniture, every trademark, and every contract of the company. As an owner, you are entitled to your share of the company’s earnings as well as any voting rights attached to the stock.

A stock is represented by a stock certificate. This is a fancy piece of paper that is proof of your ownership. In today’s computer age, you won’t actually get to see this document because your brokerage keeps these records electronically, which is also known as holding shares “in street name”. This is done to make the shares easier to trade. In the past, when a person wanted to sell his or her shares, that person physically took the certificates down to the brokerage. Now, trading with a click of the mouse or a phone call makes life easier for everybody.

Being a shareholder of a public company does not mean you have a say in the day-to-day running of the business. Instead, one vote per share to elect the board of directors at annual meetings is the extent to which you have a say in the company. For instance, being a Microsoft shareholder doesn’t mean you can call up Bill Gates and tell him how you think the company should be run. In the same line of thinking, being a shareholder of Anheuser Busch doesn’t mean you can walk into the factory and grab a free case of Bud Light!

The management of the company is supposed to increase the value of the firm for shareholders. If this doesn’t happen, the shareholders can vote to have the management removed, at least in theory. In reality, individual investors like you and I don’t own enough shares to have a material influence on the company. It’s really the big boys like large institutional investors and billionaire entrepreneurs who make the decisions.

For ordinary shareholders, not being able to manage the company isn’t such a big deal. After all, the idea is that you don’t want to have to work to make money, right? The importance of being a shareholder is that you are entitled to a portion of the company’s profits and have a claim on assets. Profits are sometimes paid out in the form of dividends. The more shares you own, the larger the portion of the profits you get. Your claim on assets is only relevant if a company goes bankrupt. In case of liquidation, you’ll receive what’s left after all the creditors have been paid. This last point is worth repeating: the importance of stock ownership is your claim on assets and earnings. Without this, the stock wouldn’t be worth the paper it’s printed on.

Another extremely important feature of stock is its limited liability, which means that, as an owner of a stock, you are not personally liable if the company is not able to pay its debts. Other companies such as partnerships are set up so that if the partnership goes bankrupt the creditors can come after the partners (shareholders) personally and sell off their house, car, furniture, etc. Owning stock means that, no matter what, the maximum value you can lose is the value of your investment. Even if a company of which you are a shareholder goes bankrupt, you can never lose your personal assets.

Debt vs. Equity
Why does a company issue stock? Why would the founders share the profits with thousands of people when they could keep profits to themselves? The reason is that at some point every company needs to raise money. To do this, companies can either borrow it from somebody or raise it by selling part of the company, which is known as issuing stock. A company can borrow by taking a loan from a bank or by issuing bonds. Both methods fit under the umbrella of debt financing. On the other hand, issuing stock is called equity financing. Issuing stock is advantageous for the company because it does not require the company to pay back the money or make interest payments along the way. All that the shareholders get in return for their money is the hope that the shares will someday be worth more than what they paid for them. The first sale of a stock, which is issued by the private company itself, is called the initial public offering (IPO).

It is important that you understand the distinction between a company financing through debt and financing through equity. When you buy a debt investment such as a bond, you are guaranteed the return of your money (the principal) along with promised interest payments. This isn’t the case with an equity investment. By becoming an owner, you assume the risk of the company not being successful – just as a small business owner isn’t guaranteed a return, neither is a shareholder. As an owner, your claim on assets is less than that of creditors. This means that if a company goes bankrupt and liquidates, you, as a shareholder, don’t get any money until the banks and bondholders have been paid out; we call this absolute priority. Shareholders earn a lot if a company is successful, but they also stand to lose their entire investment if the company isn’t successful.

Risk
It must be emphasized that there are no guarantees when it comes to individual stocks. Some companies pay out dividends, but many others do not. And there is no obligation to pay out dividends even for those firms that have traditionally given them. Without dividends, an investor can make money on a stock only through its appreciation in the open market. On the downside, any stock may go bankrupt, in which case your investment is worth nothing.

Although risk might sound all negative, there is also a bright side. Taking on greater risk demands a greater return on your investment. This is the reason why stocks have historically outperformed other investments such as bonds or savings accounts. Over the long term, an investment in stocks has historically had an average return of around 10-12%.

Toxic Assets Explained

Photobucket
“Toxic asset” is a non-technical term for certain financial assets whose value has fallen significantly and for which there is no longer a functioning market, so that they cannot be reasonably sold. The term became common during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, in which they played a major role.

When the market for such assets ceases to function, it is described as “frozen”. Markets for some toxic assets froze in 2007, and the problem grew significantly worse in the second half of 2008. Several factors contributed to the freezing of toxic asset markets. The value of the assets were very sensitive to economic conditions, and increased uncertainty in these conditions made it difficult to estimate the value of the assets. Banks and other major financial-institutions were unwilling to sell the assets at significantly reduced prices, since lower prices would force them to reduce significantly their stated assets, making them appear insolvent.

Clicky Web Analytics